The battle of the kingdom of the fjords


We investigated the effects of the Norwegian aquaculture industry on our local environment and politics. We used public available data to research three stories that could help us shed new light on ongoing conflicts.

They were:
· “Salmon farming on dispensation”: Salmon farms are growing in our local area because of dispensations from local governments. We wanted to know how many dispensations from national law were given and where they were given.
· “The sick fjord”. The fjord south of Osterøy, Sørfjorden, is in dire straits. Declining oxygen levels in the sea, worrying bottom conditions. Some experts blame the seabass farms in the fjord. Is that true? How bad is the situation? What are the consequences?
· “The dead lobsters”: 40 lobsters died on two separate locations the day after de-licing with a mix of neurotoxins at a nearby salmon farm. The Institute of marine research ruled out any connection. Could they be wrong? Was there another explanation?


Email: [email protected]
Password: snoks2900
Every 15 minutes, every day of the year, a truck crosses the border on its way out into the world with Norwegian farmed salmon. Every day throughout the last year 36 million meals with Norwegian salmon was served around the world. Currently demand greatly outstrips the supply. Minister of Fisheries Per Sandberg (The progress party) chases that objective and wants to see a fivefold growth by 2050.

There’s growing concern among experts and scientists if such a growth is sustainable. There are also they who believes that today’s production levels are too extreme. We wanted to investigate the latter by ourselves.

We knew that there were plentiful of public data about the aqua cultural industry. We asked ourselves the questions: Is the production we have today sustainable? How are fish farms affecting the environment? Are the politicians wish for growth clouding their judgment in any way?


Locations of fish farms from Norwegian Directorate of Fisheries. Both active and deleted. Also results from bottom condition examinations. Lice, disease and deaths from the Norwegian Food Safety Authority. AIS data from the Coastal Authority, reports and fact sheets from the Institute of marine research. Data about water quality from the County Governor of Hordaland. Data about dispensing of de-licing toxins from the Veterinarian institute. Information about dispensations from municipalities.

Data was acquired through open data services, FOIA-requests, interviews and questionnaires


Two journalists, two data journalist/news developers, two project leaders. The work went on for a period of two months.


“Dead lobsters”: We challenged the findings of the Institute of marine research and the conclusions presented by the Norwegian Directorate of Fisheries. A problem to show a connection was that there were no traces of the neurotoxins in the lobster. As a result of our questions the institute tested the treatment on shrimps, that also died. And no toxins could be traced in them at the laboratory. We also discovered errors in the original study regarding the doses of the neurotoxins used by the sea firm. This story is still under development.

There were in fact two different ongoing investigations on the dispensations from official authorities. Both of them had a different result. So we decided to do it ourselves and talk to all the municipalities in our county. Then we crossed our lists with official data on aqua farms to remove false positives.

“The sick fjord”: The municipality council in Osterøy is now working on strict environmental regulations for future seabass farms.


There’s not a single governmental unit that oversees aqua cultural farms. There are in fact three: The Directorate of Fisheries, The Ministry of Environment and the Norwegian Food Safety Authority. We also needed other data as weather data, ship traffic, spreadsheets from various sources. To keep track of all of our sources we built our own data harvesting tool.

We knew that our potential findings would be met with scepticism from the industry and its supporters. All wrangling of the data should be documented, preferably also scripted. If we got called out we should easily be able to recreate our findings
That data gets reported doesn’t mean its available. We tried to get historical data about de-licing from the Food Safety Authority, but they told us that they didn’t know how to retrieve them. We issued a FOIA-request for their data base structure and pinpointed the exact location of were these data were stored. During our dialogue a new public service called Barentswatch emerged.

Go to case website
Built on WordPress by Smart Media AS

Privacy Policy

The Privacy Statement is about how this website collects and uses visitor information. The statement contains information that you are entitled to when collecting information from our website (Personal Information Act, section 19), and general information about how we treat personal data (Personal Data Act, section 18, first paragraph). The legal owner of the website is the processing officer for the processing of personal data. It is voluntary for those who visit the web sites to provide personal information regarding services such as receiving newsletters and using the sharing and tip services. The treatment basis is the consent of the individual, unless otherwise specified.

1. Web analytics and cookies (cookies)

As an important part of the effort to create a user-friendly website, we look at the user pattern of those who visit the site. To analyze the information, we use the Google Analytics analysis tool. Google Analytics uses cookies (small text files that the site stores on the user's computer), which registers the users' IP address and provides information about the individual user's online movements. Examples of what the statistics give us answers to are; how many people visit different pages, how long the visit lasts, what websites users come from and what browsers are used. None of the cookies allow us to link information about your use of the site to you as an individual. The information collected by Google Analytics is stored on Google servers in the U.S.. The information received is subject to the Google Privacy Policy. An IP address is defined as a personal information because it can be traced back to a particular hardware and thus to an individual. We use Google Analytics's tracking code to anonymize the IP address before the information is stored and processed by Google. Thus, the stored IP address can not be used to identify the individual user.

2. Search

If the webpage has search function, it stores information about what keywords users use in Google Analytics. The purpose of the storage is to improve our information service. The search usage pattern is stored in aggregate form. Only the keyword is saved and they can not be linked to other information about the users, such as the IP addresses.

3. Share / Tips service

The "Share with others" feature can be used to forward links to the site by email, or to share the content of social networking. Tips for tips are not logged with us, but only used to add the tips to the community. However, we can not guarantee that the online community does not log this information. All such services should therefore be used wisely. If you use the email feature, we only use the provided email addresses to resend the message without any form of storage.

4. Newsletter

The website can send out newsletters by email if you have registered to receive this. In order for us to be able to send e-mail, you must register an e-mail address. Mailchimp is the data processor for the newsletter. The e-mail address is stored in a separate database, not shared with others and deleted when you unsubscribe. The e-mail address will also be deleted if we receive feedback that it is not active.

5. Registration, form

The website may have a form for registration, contact form or other form. These forms are available to the public to perform the tasks they are supposed to do. Registration form is for visitors to sign up or register. Contact form is for visitors to easily send a message to the website's contact person. We ask for the name of the sender and contact information for this. Personal information we receive is not used for purposes other than responding to the inquiry. The form is sent as email via Mailgun as a third party solution. The entire submission will be stored at Mailgun for 24 hours. Between 24 hours and 30 days, only mailheader is stored before the submission is deleted after 30 days. The reason for this storage is to confirm whether emails are sent from the website and forwarded to the correct recipient. Once the email is received by the recipient, it is up to the recipient to determine the data processing needs of the email.

6. Page and service functionality

Cookies are used in the operation and presentation of data from websites. Such cookies may contain language code information for languages ​​selected by the user. There may be cookies with information supporting the load balancing of the system, ensuring all users the best possible experience. For services that require login or search, cookies can be used to ensure that the service presents data to the right recipient.

7. How to manage cookies in your browser

On, read how to configure your browser to accept / reject cookies, and get tips for safer use of the internet.